Vendor-published
Tastewise MCP server
Food and beverage consumer intelligence, exposed to AI assistants over MCP. Access is arranged through a sales conversation rather than self-serve documentation.
Not listed in the public MCP Registry.
Not listed in the public MCP Registry. We enumerated the registry to cursor exhaustion on 2026-09-20 (337 pages, 33,644 records) and found no Tastewise entry.
Tastewise operates MCP Compare.
This entry is evaluated against the same published criteria as every other server, using only evidence any reader can reproduce. It is currently the least documented profile on the site. See about and ownership.
Identity and maintenance
| Registry name | No registry entry |
|---|---|
| Publisher domain | tastewise.io |
| Maintainer type | Vendor-published Not listed in the public MCP Registry. We enumerated the registry to cursor exhaustion on 2026-09-20 (337 pages, 33,644 records) and found no Tastewise entry. |
| Latest version seen | Not published |
| Last checked | |
| Last changed | Separate from “last checked”: we check far more often than anything changes. |
Enterprise evaluation
Every row below exists whether or not we found an answer. Expand any row to see the exact source and the date. Unknown means undocumented, never unsupported.
| Access and authentication | |
|---|---|
| Authentication required Whether the hosted endpoint accepted a connection with no credentials when we checked. | Yes We checked checkedAn unauthenticated request to https://tastewise.io/wp-json/mcp/mcp-oauth-server is rejected; the apex domain publishes RFC 9728 protected-resource metadata pointing at it. Unauthenticated connection attempt — https://tastewise.io/wp-json/mcp/mcp-oauth-server |
| OAuth 2.1 authorization Whether the server publishes OAuth discovery metadata a client can follow automatically. | Yes We checked checkedhttps://tastewise.io/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource -> 200, naming authorization server https://tastewise.io OAuth Protected Resource Metadata — https://tastewise.io/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource |
| Dynamic client registration Without it, an IdP administrator must register a client by hand before anyone can connect. | Not documented We checked checkedauthorization-server metadata published, but no registration_endpoint Authorization Server Metadata — https://tastewise.io/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server |
| Documented scopes | Yes mcp We checked checked"scopes_supported": ["mcp"] OAuth Protected Resource Metadata — https://tastewise.io/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource |
| Read and write are separate scopes A single opaque scope means read-only access cannot be granted: approving access approves everything. | No We checked checkedscopes_supported is ["mcp"] -- a single scope covering both reading and writing, so read-only access cannot be granted OAuth Protected Resource Metadata — https://tastewise.io/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource |
| Deployment and transport | |
| Streamable HTTP transport | Not documented Vendor checkedNo public Tastewise page documents this. Access is gated behind a sales conversation. Tastewise public documentation — https://tastewise.io/integrations |
| SSE transport | Not documented Vendor checkedNo public Tastewise page documents this. Access is gated behind a sales conversation. Tastewise public documentation — https://tastewise.io/integrations |
| Vendor-hosted endpoint Data leaves your network. Where it goes is a question for the vendor's documentation. | Yes We checked checked"resource": "https://tastewise.io/wp-json/mcp/mcp-oauth-server" -- a vendor-operated endpoint OAuth Protected Resource Metadata — https://tastewise.io/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource |
| Self-hostable package A published npm, PyPI, container or bundle artifact you can run inside your own perimeter. | Not documented Vendor checkedNo public Tastewise page documents this. Access is gated behind a sales conversation. Tastewise public documentation — https://tastewise.io/integrations |
| Supply chain | |
| Public source repository | Not documented Vendor checkedThe public Tastewise GitHub organisation exposes no MCP server implementation. GitHub organisation — https://github.com/tastewise |
| Open-source license | Not documented Vendor checkedNo public Tastewise page documents this. Access is gated behind a sales conversation. Tastewise public documentation — https://tastewise.io/integrations |
| Repository actively maintained | Not documented Vendor checkedNo public Tastewise page documents this. Access is gated behind a sales conversation. Tastewise public documentation — https://tastewise.io/integrations |
| Package deprecated | Not documented Vendor checkedNo public Tastewise page documents this. Access is gated behind a sales conversation. Tastewise public documentation — https://tastewise.io/integrations |
| Secret inputs marked as secret Credential-shaped inputs the publisher did not flag as secret may be logged by a client. | Not documented Vendor checkedNo public Tastewise page documents this. Access is gated behind a sales conversation. Tastewise public documentation — https://tastewise.io/integrations |
| Documented controls | |
| Audit logging documented | Not documented Vendor checkedNo public Tastewise page documents this. Access is gated behind a sales conversation. Tastewise public documentation — https://tastewise.io/integrations |
| Access controls documented | Not documented Vendor checkedNo public Tastewise page documents this. Access is gated behind a sales conversation. Tastewise public documentation — https://tastewise.io/integrations |
| Data residency documented | Not documented Vendor checkedNo public Tastewise page documents this. Access is gated behind a sales conversation. Tastewise public documentation — https://tastewise.io/integrations |
| Data retention documented | Not documented Vendor checkedNo public Tastewise page documents this. Access is gated behind a sales conversation. Tastewise public documentation — https://tastewise.io/integrations |
What remains unknown
13 of 18 criteria are undocumented. These are the questions to put to the vendor — not conclusions about the product.
- Dynamic client registration — authorization-server metadata published, but no registration_endpoint
- Streamable HTTP transport — No public Tastewise page documents this. Access is gated behind a sales conversation.
- SSE transport — No public Tastewise page documents this. Access is gated behind a sales conversation.
- Self-hostable package — No public Tastewise page documents this. Access is gated behind a sales conversation.
- Public source repository — The public Tastewise GitHub organisation exposes no MCP server implementation.
- Open-source license — No public Tastewise page documents this. Access is gated behind a sales conversation.
- Repository actively maintained — No public Tastewise page documents this. Access is gated behind a sales conversation.
- Package deprecated — No public Tastewise page documents this. Access is gated behind a sales conversation.
- Secret inputs marked as secret — No public Tastewise page documents this. Access is gated behind a sales conversation.
- Audit logging documented — No public Tastewise page documents this. Access is gated behind a sales conversation.
- Access controls documented — No public Tastewise page documents this. Access is gated behind a sales conversation.
- Data residency documented — No public Tastewise page documents this. Access is gated behind a sales conversation.
- Data retention documented — No public Tastewise page documents this. Access is gated behind a sales conversation.
Questions people ask
- Does the Tastewise MCP server require authentication?
- Yes. When we connected to its endpoint without credentials on 2026-09-20, it returned HTTP undefined.
- Can I grant read-only access to the Tastewise MCP server?
- No. It publishes [], which does not separate reading from writing, so granting access grants both.
- Can the Tastewise MCP server be self-hosted?
- Not from the registry record. No installable package is declared, so the vendor-hosted endpoint is the only documented option.